
This is at the very least his second film in row that apparently won’t get the critical opportunity that it deserves as a piece of art to be, given media and random celebrities with unnecessarily loud and uncontemplative voices. At least all the critiques of Antichrist in the mainstream media that I read were too occupied with violent fetishes – and the recurrent panic – of the reviewers themselves to see the questions posed by the director. A pity.
Though I'm sure von Trier has often enough depicted how apparently good it feels have a fellow human being on his/her/its knees.
That’s what you get when you let entertainers organise what was intended assumedly to be an art festival, and invite politicians and super models as guests. Bonfires of anything that attempts to address our worst fears and sins too honestly will burn all too often, as they always have. Perhaps this is a moment of hope: Art is still dangerous and Europe still retains some of its faculties. It is a fine and optimistic gesture from von Trier to place the judging power on other film directors. Could an artist or a thinker of any merit silence another and live with oneself?
In any event, is it necessary (/possible) for a fine cultural philosophical thinker to be a reliably nice human being?
(image: so that von Trier will know better!)
Hear, hear. And the poster! :D -K.
ReplyDeleteYes, hear that? - 'hear'. =;) It's always painful to see people's artistic and ethical journeys limited by what can't even be called puny social political reasons.
ReplyDelete